Mandala Tribal

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Indonesia Tribes
  • Tribal Economies
  • Tribal Money
  • Tribes Of The World
  • Finance Debt

Mandala Tribal

Header Banner

Mandala Tribal

  • Home
  • Indonesia Tribes
  • Tribal Economies
  • Tribal Money
  • Tribes Of The World
  • Finance Debt
Indonesia Tribes
Home›Indonesia Tribes›Australia’s embrace of nuclear submarine technology strengthens its role as a regional foil against China

Australia’s embrace of nuclear submarine technology strengthens its role as a regional foil against China

By Mary Romo
September 16, 2021
0
0

It is not called the nuclear option for nothing.

One momentous decision reconfigures Australia’s relationship between its oldest ally, key security partner and biggest customer.

This will piss off some of Australia’s neighbors and require skillful diplomacy.

This will likely force Labor to agree, even reluctantly, due to a shared commitment to the US alliance.

Australia’s adoption of US-UK nuclear submarine technology reinforces its role as a regional foil against Beijing’s assertiveness.

Talk about choosing sides – not that China would have had any doubts about Australia’s security allegiance.

But this is a formal statement as a technological embrace.

Australia to acquire nuclear submarines in landmark deal with US and UK

In a bid to counter China’s growing regional influence, Australia is joining a historic partnership with the United States and the United Kingdom to acquire nuclear submarines.

Read more

In about ten years, the fleet of nuclear-powered submarines of the Royal Australian Navy will be a structural element of the American Indo-Pacific pivot.

Its main task will be to counter the increased militarization of the crowded and highly contested seas in the north, west and east of Australia.

In this regard, the Australia-UK-US Trilateral Security Partnership, or AUKUS, is the embodiment of the ANZUS Pact, 70 years after its signing.

Once you have embarked on this nuclear path, there is no turning back.

That Australia sees fit to tear up a $ 90 billion contract with the French to build up to 12 conventionally powered submarines shows how much the security environment is considered to have changed in the five years since followed the signing of the agreement.

Allies’ attitude towards the Chinese president over the past decade has shifted from Xi Jinping’s driven curiosity about regional adventurism to aversion to Beijing’s outright militarism, debt diplomacy and cyberbullying. sanctioned.

Plan under construction for months

French President Emmanuel Macron is furious that Naval Group’s lucrative contract is sunk, but he must have known that the submarine deal was taking water when Scott Morrison visited him in mid-June .

The Prime Minister has clearly expressed Australia’s concern about the drift of the project. Morrison demanded a clear September deadline for his design work.

He informed Macron that when it comes to Australia, the strategic environment has changed.

What the Prime Minister did not tell Macron during this long dinner in Paris – and perhaps why the French president could be particularly upset – is that Morrison had, just a day before, already concluded an informal agreement with United States President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson for an extension of a nuclear technology sharing agreement.

This revelation brings a new face to the tripartite meeting in Carbis Bay in Cornwall on June 12 between the two PMs and the US president.

Boris Johnson, Scott Morrison and Joe Biden pose for a photo.
Boris Johnson (left), Scott Morrison (center) and Joe Biden met at the G7 summit in Cornwall earlier this year.(

Provided: Australian Government

)

Johnson has been, by some observers, described as the awkward peacemaker between Morrison and Biden over alleged differences over climate change.

It turns out that this three-way meeting may be the most important in decades; it ended with the understanding that Australia could indeed be extended to nuclear secrets previously held in Washington and London since 1958.

The CBA understands that the federal government began exploring the option of nuclear-powered submarines about 18 months ago, when Linda Reynolds was still Minister of Defense.

It was tentatively discussed at the “systems level” with the British and the Americans – that is, whether nuclear submarines were feasible in an Australian context.

It has not been raised with the Trump administration at the political level, although there have been extensive discussions at the military level.

No need to raise it between rulers and ministers if there’s no way to make it work, was the thought.

It wasn’t until April of this year that the Australian government officially approached the United States to share its nuclear submarine technology.

The French agreement still hinged on the answer.

“It wasn’t a change of mind, it was a change of need,” said an Australian government official.

Loading

Diplomatic challenges aside, the cost will be enormous

About $ 2.4 billion already swallowed up in French construction are lost. Some say it’s more. The Naval Group will demand significant compensation of several hundred million dollars.

And going nuclear will cost much more, even if Australia is only building eight in the Osborne shipyards in Adelaide, instead of 12 as provided for in the French agreement.

Sources claim that building eight nuclear submarines will cost well over $ 100 billion and that country’s defense spending will be well over 2% of GDP for decades to come, given the AUKUS deal includes long-range strike capability, unmanned underwater drones, artificial intelligence and quantum technologies.

Regionally, Morrison’s urgent task is to reassure New Zealand, a partner of Five Eyes, whose anti-nuclear stance has long tested the ANZUS treaty, and Indonesia.

Why Australia wants nuclear submarines

A French nuclear submarine.

Australia has announced a plan to power the Navy’s next fleet of submarines with nuclear power. So what’s so special about these submarines – and why are we doing this?

Read more

After the Cabinet National Security Committee approved the nuclear option, Morrison’s first appeal was to his Kiwi counterpart, Jacinda Ardern.

Morrison wants Ardern to be a partner in reassuring Asia-Pacific and ASEAN countries. It is not known if she will play this role.

Defense Minister Peter Dutton briefed Indonesian Defense Minister Prabowo Subianto on Wednesday evening.

Maintaining good relations with Indonesia has long been considered essential to Australia’s security.

Nationally, Morrison will face significant challenges, many of which will only be alleviated if Labor expands two-party politics.

On manufacturing capability, home maintenance and sustainment, Labor is offering strong support, although some in the ALP ranks will object to Australia becoming beholden to the scope. nuclear power, as argued by former Prime Minister Paul Keating.

“This arrangement would result in a further dramatic loss of Australian sovereignty, as material dependence on the United States would deprive Australia of any freedom or choice in any engagement that Australia may deem appropriate,” Keating said. .

Jacinda Ardern addressing the audience, with the flag behind
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern was the first leader called by Morrison.(

ROBERT KITCHIN / POOL / AFP via Getty Images

)

Morrison’s response to Keating was to refer to Australia’s “forever relationship” with the United States and Britain.

“I’d rather be around John Curtin and Robert Menzies when it comes to this issue,” Morrison told reporters.

But history is still written and Australian political writers come from two tribes.

Anthony Albanese says Labor has three conditions to support nuclear-powered submarines: that there is no requirement for a domestic civilian nuclear industry and no acquisition of nuclear weapons.

Third, Labor wants absolute assurance that the deal is consistent with Australia’s obligations as a non-nuclear weapon state under the non-proliferation treaty.

The government insists that the three conditions will be met. If so, Labor appears as a lock.

Indeed, Biden and Johnson have separately claimed that the submarines will not have nuclear weapons, although this was more to avoid stoking tensions with China.

It will come anyway.

The geostrategic struggle between Washington and Beijing is one for the ages, and Australia must now play an even bigger role – in a stealthier and faster nuclear kit.

Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to search, up and down arrows for volume.
Play the video.  Duration: 6 minutes 8 seconds

Australia forced to “choose sides” in new defense alliance

Related posts:

  1. Unrest erupts on third night time of protests in opposition to Daunte Wright’s gunshot demise
  2. Bipartisan invoice would create hundreds of jobs whereas decreasing air pollution from orphan wells
  3. The semi-cap sector will tear itself aside all year long: Tematica Analysis CIO
  4. Iran vows revenge after blackout at nuclear website
Tagsclimate changefederal governmentjoe bidenpresident joeunited states

Recent Posts

  • 1st Native American Treasurer Appointed, Oversees Mint | Your money
  • Synchrony Financial (NYSE:SYF) upgraded to buy on StockNews.com
  • World Music Day: Meet the Tetseo sisters who use YouTube to bring their language to life
  • KP Budget: PTI Budget—A Look Ahead – Newspaper
  • Casino Consultancy Says Smoking Bans Do Not Harm Gambling

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019

Categories

  • Finance Debt
  • Indonesia Tribes
  • Tribal Economies
  • Tribal Money
  • Tribes Of The World
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy